Key insights

• ⚗️ Challenges in getting research published in scientific journals
• ⚕️ Medical prejudices and bias in publishing
• 📚 Influence of journal owners, particularly the Chinese
• ⚖️ Concerns about objectivity and bias in scientific research publishing
• 💼 Pressure to publish in line with preconceived ideologies affecting scientific publications
• 📄 Japanese paper highlighting link between spike proteins and microclots as a potential factor in cancer development
• ⚠️ The potential connection between COVID, microclots, and cancer
• ⚠️ Concern about the impact of the spike protein and its role in blood clotting

Q&A

• What is the resistance to acknowledging vaccine-related concerns?

  There is resistance to acknowledging vaccine-related concerns, similar to the historical resistance to accepting the link between smoking and cancer. Scientists report that the spike protein binds to important genes linked to cancer, raising concerns about potential long-term impacts.

• What are the potential risks of mRNA vaccines?

  The potential risks of mRNA vaccines include the formation of clots and the possibility of causing cancer due to the large number of nanoparticle molecules in the vaccine. There are concerns about the long-term impact of the vaccine on cancer development.

• What is the impact of immune activation on health outcomes?

  Immune activation and inflammation can lead to adverse health effects, potentially causing up to 20% of people to have dirty blood due to disseminated intravascular coagulation related to the spike protein. Reports of long clots in major vessels of deceased individuals have been censored and are hard to publish.

• What is the potential link between spike proteins, microclots, and cancer?

  There is a potential connection between COVID, microclots, and cancer, highlighting the importance of recent research on disseminated intravascular coagulation and the impact of spike protein on blood clotting. The increase in cases of Dirty blood since the pandemic is also noteworthy.

• How does pressure to publish affect scientific publications?

  Scientists face pressure to publish in line with political or preconceived ideologies, leading to censorship and misinformation. Research on the origins of events like lockdowns or vaccines may be censored or rejected.

• What are the challenges in getting research published in scientific journals?

  The challenges in scientific research publishing include medical prejudices and biases, the influence of journal owners, particularly the Chinese, and concerns about objectivity and bias in research dissemination.

• 00:00 The speaker discusses the challenges of getting research published in scientific journals, highlighting medical prejudices and the influence of journal owners, particularly the Chinese. There are concerns about the objectivity and bias in publishing scientific research.
• 02:25 Scientists facing pressure to publish in line with political or preconceived ideologies, leading to censorship and misinformation. A Japanese paper highlights the link between spike proteins and microclots, shedding light on potential impact on cancer development.
• 05:08 The discussion covers the potential connection between COVID, microclots, and cancer, highlighting the importance of a recent paper and the condition called disseminated intravascular coagulation. There's concern about the impact of the spike protein and its role in blood clotting. The increase in cases of Dirty blood in Embers since the pandemic is also noteworthy.
• 07:26 The speaker discusses the potential connection between the spike protein and disseminated intravascular coagulation, emphasizing the impact of immune activation on health outcomes.
• 09:39 The speaker discusses the potential risks of mRNA vaccines, including the formation of clots and the possibility of causing cancer due to the large number of nanoparticle molecules in the vaccine. There are concerns about the long-term impact of the vaccine on cancer development.
• 12:29 Scientists report that the spike protein binds to important genes linked to cancer, similar to the historical resistance to accepting the link between smoking and cancer. Concerns about potential long-term impacts and resistance to acknowledging vaccine-related concerns.